Transparency
Transparency report.
What we were asked to remove, what we decided and how long it took — the yearly report Article 15 of the EU Digital Services Act asks of a small provider. The numbers come straight from our moderation records. They are counts; no report, person or image is identified.
2026
Generated 2026-10-23 from the moderation records.
Notices and reports received
| Reports received | 0 |
|---|---|
| Upheld (content removed or kept removed) | 0 |
| Dismissed (content restored or kept) | 0 |
| Still open at the time of this report | 0 |
| Median time from report to decision | 0 hours |
| Intimate-image requests decided within the 48-hour commitment | No intimate-image request was received. |
Restrictions we imposed
| Actions taken (warning, pause, block) | 0 |
|---|---|
| Of these, taken by automated means | 0 |
Every decision was taken by a person; no restriction was imposed by automated means.
Appeals
| Appeals received | 0 |
|---|---|
| Granted (restriction lifted) | 0 |
| Denied | 0 |
| Still open | 0 |
| Median time to decide an appeal | 0 hours |
Orders from authorities
| Orders to act against illegal content (DSA Art. 9) | 0 |
|---|---|
| Orders to provide information (DSA Art. 10) | 0 |
How these numbers are made
- Every report — from the item's owner in the app, from the public form at tincograph.com/report, or filed by an administrator — is a row in our moderation records with a type, a filing time and a decision time.
- A decision is always taken by a person. The AI safety checks that refuse a prompt or an output before anything is published are not decisions about reports and are not counted here.
- The numbers are generated by a script that only reads counts (the function it calls cannot return anything else) and are published once a year, or sooner if something changes.
- Orders from authorities arrive outside the database and are entered by hand.